Pasalao

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: ຍິປຸນບໍ່ຢ້ານລະເບີດຄິວເຄັລຍ Nuclear bombs ຈີນແດງຈັກໜ້ອຍ.
Anonymous

Date:
ຍິປຸນບໍ່ຢ້ານລະເບີດຄິວເຄັລຍ Nuclear bombs ຈີນແດງຈັກໜ້ອຍ.


ຍິປຸນ ສາມາດ ສ້າງລະເບີດ ນິວເຄັລຍ(1000 Nuclear bombs )ໃດ້ທຸກເວລາ.

ຖ້າສະຫາລັດ ອາເມຣີກາ ອະນຸຍາດ ໃຫ້ສ້າງ ເພາະຍິປຸນ ແພ້ສົງຄາມໂລກຄັ່ງທີສອງ

ອາເມຣີກາ ຫ້າມບໍ່ໃຫ້ ສ້າງລະເບີດ ນິວເຄັລຍ.ຖ້າສົງຄາມ ຈະເກີດຂື້ນ ລະຫວ່າງຈີນແດງກັບຍິປຸນ

ຈີນແດງ ມີທະຫານແລະລະເບີດ ຫລາຍກວ່າຍິປຸນ ແຕ່ອາວຸດຍິປຸນ ມີຄຸນມະພາບ ດີກວ່າຈີນແດງ.

 Japan has enough plutonium to build 1,000 nuclear bombs: report
Want China Times ^ | 2013-12-31

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQFGq5e9fCHUmWf4vvEpebGmxNj7fMnuoIkOqWYHmjPqkLxaJWu

 

Posted on Tuesday, December 31, 2013 11:50:31 AM by sukhoi-30mki

The real reason why Japan's prime minister, Shinzo Abe, refuses to abandon nuclear power is because he wants to develop a nuclear weapons program, claims the Hong Kong-based Wen Wei Po, citing Koide Hiroaki, an assistant professor at the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute.

There have been strong calls for Tokyo to reconsider its position on nuclear energy after the Fukushima nuclear incident in March 2011, when the Fukushima Daiichi plant north of Tokyo was hit by an earthquake and tsunami, triggering the world's worst nuclear incident since Chernobyl.

Despite the risks, Hiroaki said that Tokyo is determined to develop a nuclear bomb. As Japan is not allowed to legally import weapons-grade plutonium, he says it is able to extract the plutonium it needs from the nuclear waste from the country's power plants.

US analysts estimate that Japan currently has enough plutonium to build at least 1,000 nuclear bombs. Under its constitution Japan is not allowed to own any weapon with offensive capabilities including the nuclear bomb. However, a growing number of Japanese politicians have begun to call for the abolition of the nation's Three Non-Nuclear Principles as tension between Japan and China over the disputed East China Sea escalates.

The Three Non-Nuclear Principles were outlined by former Japanese prime minister Eisaku Sato in a speech to the House of Representatives in 1967. Under the principles, Japan shall neither possess nor manufacture nuclear weapons, nor shall it permit their introduction into Japanese territory.

The principles have guided Japan's nuclear policy since their inception. However, in order to win right-wing support Abe continues to push ahead and reactive nuclear power plants in Japan despite protest from home and abroad, Wen Wei Po said, adding that this is a very dangerous move for Japan since it will only bring instability to the Asia-Pacific region.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:
RE: ຍິປຸນບໍ່ຢ້ານລະເບີດຄິວເຄັລຍ Nuclear bombs ຈີນແດງຈັກໜ້ອຍ.


ແມ່ນໃຜ ຊິໃດ້ ໄຊຊະນະ ລະຫວ່າງ ຍິປຸນກັບຈີນແດງ.

ໃຕ້ຫວັນ ເປັນເກາະນ້ອຍ ຂອງຈີນແດງແທ້ໆ. ຈີນແດງ

ຍັງບໍ່ກ້າ ບຸກເອົາຄືນ. ຖ້າຣົບ ກັບຍິປຸນ ມັນຊິເປັນຈັງໃດ ?

ຈີນແດງ ກ້າແຕ່ບຸກ ຫວຽດນາມ .



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Anonymous wrote:

ແມ່ນໃຜ ຊິໃດ້ ໄຊຊະນະ ລະຫວ່າງ ຍິປຸນກັບຈີນແດງ.

ໃຕ້ຫວັນ ເປັນເກາະນ້ອຍ ຂອງຈີນແດງແທ້ໆ. ຈີນແດງ

ຍັງບໍ່ກ້າ ບຸກເອົາຄືນ. ຖ້າຣົບ ກັບຍິປຸນ ມັນຊິເປັນຈັງໃດ ?

ຈີນແດງ ກ້າແຕ່ບຸກ ຫວຽດນາມ .


 China will never win Japan



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

ແມ່ນໃຜ ຊິໃດ້ ໄຊຊະນະ ລະຫວ່າງ ຍິປຸນກັບຈີນແດງ.

ໃຕ້ຫວັນ ເປັນເກາະນ້ອຍ ຂອງຈີນແດງແທ້ໆ. ຈີນແດງ

ຍັງບໍ່ກ້າ ບຸກເອົາຄືນ. ຖ້າຣົບ ກັບຍິປຸນ ມັນຊິເປັນຈັງໃດ ?

ຈີນແດງ ກ້າແຕ່ບຸກ ຫວຽດນາມ .


 China will never win Japan


 Why ? One on One with America and NATO.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 

Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 ຍ້ອງກັນລົງໄປເລີຍ ຍ້ອງກັນຫຼາຍໆ ລາວນັ່ງບັງພຸ່ມຫົວຂວັນຢູ່ເດີ ຊິບອກໃຫ້.

 



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 

Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 ຍ້ອງກັນລົງໄປເລີຍ ຍ້ອງກັນຫຼາຍໆ ລາວນັ່ງບັງພຸ່ມຫົວຂວັນຢູ່ເດີ ຊິບອກໃຫ້.

 


 5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555.



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

A Japanese F-15.

China's soaring military spending — up 12.3% this year — and aggressive gestures in the region could be setting the scene for major conflict. With various countries feuding over Pacific territory, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe compared the ratcheting tensions to Europe before World War I

China's $188 billion military budget far surpasses the $49 billion budget of Japan, its biggest regional rival, even if it doesn't come close toAmerica's budget of $640 billion.

China's military is also much bigger than Japan's, with lots more equipment and 2.3 million active personnel compared to 58,000. Consequently, China ranks third on the Global Firepower Index, which heavily weights sheer numbers, behind the U.S. and Russia and ahead of Japan at tenth.

But is China's military actually stronger than Japan's?

First of all, it should be noted that any military conflict between China and Japan would likely draw in Japan's superpower ally. The U.S. is bound by a mutual defense treaty to protect Japan, including the contested Senkaku islands, and it operates numerous military bases in Japan.

Even on its own, however, Japan's smaller military has a qualitative advantage over China.

The majority of Chinese weapons systems are in various stages of decay, as detailed by Kyle Mizokami at War Is Boring. Only 450 of China's 7,580 tanks are anywhere near modern. Likewise, only 502 of China's 1,321 strong air force are deemed capable — the rest date to refurbished Soviet planes from the 1970s. Only half of China's submarines have been built within the past twenty years.

China's first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning, is a refurbished Soviet ship from the 1980s that is too small to launch most long-range planes and will probably be limited to hugging China's coast.

In comparison, Japan has been supplied with advanced military equipment from the U.S. In the coming year, it is slated to purchase new anti-missile destroyers, submarines, amphibious vehicles, surveillance drones, fighter planes, and V-22 Ospreys from the U.S. Japan also expects to receive deliveries of F-35s starting in March 2017.

The F-35 is Liaoning's worst nightmare, China's state-owned Global Times reported based on aKanwa Asian Defense, which found that the F-35 could strike the Liaoning with hard-to-intercept joint strike missiles from a safe distance of 290km. The F-35 should also be able to locate and engage China's main aircraft, the J-15, before the F-35 is even detected.

The Japanese islands are also well protected by a missile defense system equipped with Standard Missile-3 and Patriot Advanced Capability-3 interceptors. These missiles are capable of shooting down a ballistic missile both inside and outside of Earth's atmosphere.

"Japan has the strongest navy and air force in Asia except for the United States," Dr. Larry M. Wortzel, the president of Asia Strategies and Riskssaid in a presentation at  the Institute of World Politics last September. "They're still restricted by Article 9 of the Constitution, which forever renounces war as a sovereign right of the nation ... but you don't want to mess with them."

While Japan maintains a significant qualitative advantage, however, the vast size of China's military should not be understated, nor its rapid expansion and modernization. No wonder Japan has responded with its first military expansion in more than 40 years.

Meanwhile, the standoff is hurting most groups short of the military industrial complex.

As noted by U.S. Trust's Joseph Quinlan: "No one is predicting an armed conflict between China and Japan, but the rising ill will between the two parties hardly engenders investor confidence in a region built on peaceful regional relations and unfettered trade and investment flows."



__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 

Anonymous wrote:

Don't even think about it. China and Russia technology

such as computer robot , drone, weapon satellite,

computer even chemical and biological weapon still

50 years behind the United States and Japan and NATO.

Maybe China VS India will be fair fight . Japan could build up

their military and their production and technology are ready

to go if there is a war.


 ຍ້ອງກັນລົງໄປເລີຍ ຍ້ອງກັນຫຼາຍໆ ລາວນັ່ງບັງພຸ່ມຫົວຂວັນຢູ່ເດີ ຊິບອກໃຫ້.

 


 5555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555.


ລາວຊິເຮັດຫຍັງໃດ້ ມີແຕ່ຖ້ານັ່ງແບມື  ຂໍທານເງີນການຊວຍເຫລືອ

ແລະນັ່ງ ພັບຕາ ຂາວມານໆ ເບີງແກວ ແລ່ນ

ໄປ ເລັຍດາກແຫລ້ ບັກໂອມາບາ ຂໍຄວາມຄູ້ມຄອງ

ຈາກການ ລຸກຮານ ຂອງເຈັກ. ກະດຽວວ່າ ລາວຫາກັບ

ມາຈາກຂໍທ່ານເງີນ ການຊວຍເຫລືອ ຈາກເຈັກ.

ເຈັກຈະບໍ່ທາງ ໃຫ້ຫຍັງ ປະຊາຊົນ ລາວຝີຣ ຈັກຢ່າງ.

ເຈັກຕ້ອງໃດ້ ຜົນປະໂຫຍດ ກັບຄືນຢ່າງມະຫາສານ.

ພະມ້າຮູ້ດີຈືງປະທ້ວງ. ມີແຕ່ລາວ ຜູ້ນຳສະຫລາດສອງໃສ

ຮ່ວມມືກັບເຈັກ ກອບໂກຍ ຜົນປະໂຫຍດ ຂອງປະເທດ

ຊາດເອົາປຽບແລະ ສໍໂກງປະຊາຊົນ ຜູ້ດ້ອຍການສືກສາ .



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.



Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard