The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
Sorry, the first post from Lao to English.
Thanks, that's what I thought. So the data the person post had no merit to this topic because the study wasn't just for the kids that were born here. I'm interesting to see the study just for the Lao kids that were born here in the state.
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
Sorry, the first post from Lao to English.
Thanks, that's what I thought. So the data the person post had no merit to this topic because the study wasn't just for the kids that were born here. I'm interesting to see the study just for the Lao kids that were born here in the state.
The study focused on second-generation Laotian, Viet, Hmong and Cambodian. Second generation includes the kids who were born here in the US and the kids who came here very young (like 3 years old) who grew up from kids to adulthood in this country. The study investigated the education, wages, and managerial/professional employment of these southeast Asians relative to African Americans and whites. The data show that the second-generation Vietnamese stand out as having extraordinarily high average values on these indicators. By contrast, the socioeconomic attainments of second-generation Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be closer to those of African Americans.
The data didn't mention that it was specifically for the children that were born in the US.
The same authors had done the same types of studies by taking into account the first generation and second generation of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants. Basically similar finding had been reported. The more ambitious, hard-working, and disciplined Vietnamese have been always far ahead of us.
"...In general, our bivariate results may be summarized as indicating that Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be disadvantaged relative to whites, whereas Vietnamese tend to be advantaged. Furthermore, the main engine of the bivariate socioeconomic differentials seems to be education. Most of the differences in the wages and managerial/professional employment of second-generation Southeast Asians and whites are eliminated after controlling for education and a few other basic demographic characteristics. The Vietnamese have higher wages and managerial/ professional employment than whites primarily because the Vietnamese have more education. Conversely, Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to have lower wages and less managerial/professional employment than whites primarily because these groups have less education than whites...."
This topic is about Lao children that were born in the US are lazy and uneducated... I couldn't find anywhere in the above post that it state as such. I do believe it was for the whole general population to include the first refugee generation who were mostly uneducated farmer.
This topic is about the assumption that Viet refugees and more educated and successful than Lao refugees. The posts above indeed show data that help confirm that the Viet are clearly more successful in education attainment than Lao refugees.
Read the first post then translate to Lao for me..
Which post are you talking about? Can you copy and paste it here so that members here will try to translate into Lao for you?
Sorry, the first post from Lao to English.
Thanks, that's what I thought. So the data the person post had no merit to this topic because the study wasn't just for the kids that were born here. I'm interesting to see the study just for the Lao kids that were born here in the state.
The study focused on second-generation Laotian, Viet, Hmong and Cambodian. Second generation includes the kids who were born here in the US and the kids who came here very young (like 3 years old) who grew up from kids to adulthood in this country. The study investigated the education, wages, and managerial/professional employment of these southeast Asians relative to African Americans and whites. The data show that the second-generation Vietnamese stand out as having extraordinarily high average values on these indicators. By contrast, the socioeconomic attainments of second-generation Cambodians, Hmong, and Laotians tend to be closer to those of African Americans.