Crown Prince Chao Xay Vongsavang died at the detention camp along with the King and the Queen (not the same time). One of his son lived in France now. (if I am wrong, please correct me)
Crown Prince Chao Xay Vongsavang died at the detention camp along with the King and the Queen (not the same time). One of his son lived in France now. (if I am wrong, please correct me)
Someone had witnessed his death! He was treated in a very inhuman way to his death by Neo Lao Huck sat!!!!!!
Why do you want to know ? They don't even care about laos or reunited of all lao people inside and outside the country. I'm a halve blood Luangphabang and I don't even care about these Royal family. They the (Monarchy) that hold back a country development... if our country(LAOS) has a chance to go back to democracy I'd never want to see a Monarcy system anymore.... Apologize for give you this kinda answer. No hard feeling ok.
Why do you want to know ? They don't even care about laos or reunited of all lao people inside and outside the country. I'm a halve blood Luangphabang and I don't even care about these Royal family. They the (Monarchy) that hold back a country development... if our country(LAOS) has a chance to go back to democracy I'd never want to see a Monarcy system anymore.... Apologize for give you this kinda answer. No hard feeling ok.
Why do you want to know ? They don't even care about laos or reunited of all lao people inside and outside the country. I'm a halve blood Luangphabang and I don't even care about these Royal family. They the (Monarchy) that hold back a country development... if our country(LAOS) has a chance to go back to democracy I'd never want to see a Monarcy system anymore.... Apologize for give you this kinda answer. No hard feeling ok.
Why you wanna answer like that? All I wanna kno is just for educational purpose only. if you don't have the information regarless of what i wanna kno, it's better to not post anything. What do you think?
Why do you want to know ? They don't even care about laos or reunited of all lao people inside and outside the country. I'm a halve blood Luangphabang and I don't even care about these Royal family. They the (Monarchy) that hold back a country development... if our country(LAOS) has a chance to go back to democracy I'd never want to see a Monarcy system anymore.... Apologize for give you this kinda answer. No hard feeling ok.
we should be proud of our Royal family too. the Royal family had has been up and down. we have to thank their brave and warior, we still have laoland today. so many royal family had died to their belove that land so then lao people until 1975 they gave up to lao citizens to protect on thier own. they try very hard to protect us from harm and they want bring lao together they had failed us because we are the ones misuderstand eachothers. this is nobody's fault. we don't blame Royal family whatsoever reasons and we don't blame the new regime to taking over. it is not to late to develop out country if lao nai and lao living aboard are understanding to solve the solution. look at Vietname today, and they have the same problems like us. but you don't understand what our Royal family have gon to hard time with their life and they had been been paying with their roll in the past because we have so many enimies in the our past to take control of that laoland.
As far as I know , Royal from Luang Phabang mostly are living in France some live in the Northeast of the United Staes which is I myself knew them in personally. As for Southern Royal families '' TaKoon'' Nachampasak, they're also living in France and scatering around in the United States especially in the West Coast, and there's also many ''fake'' Nachampasak last name too just to get out of the'' Hell Refugee Camp'' and who can blame them for that ...-
The conflict in our belove country''LAOS'', is in one sence the prolongationof a centuries old process whereby the feudal principalities of the left bank of the Mekong were bound by ties of vassalage and forced alliances to our more powerful neighbors to the Southwest. In another very real sense, however,this conflict is marked by entirely new forces to attraction and subjugation, with far reaching implications for a world in which the confrontation between the newclear powers has reach stalmate and the gap between the '' Have peoples and the have not peoples is wider than it has ever been. Even then, the United States coveted no material possessions in Laos and other countries of Indochina. It was conceivable that it might assume a new role once the colonial war ended. American went to LAOS to establish technical assistance missions. but the fighting did not stop. Cynically encuraged by the Vietnamese Communists across an ill defined border, a minority faction of the nationalist movement that had been alienated by the west sought to widen its influence in Laos, using guerrilla warfare to achieve this goal. the implications of the Laos conflict are clear. Given the close identity of views between the man responsible for North Vietnam's successes in Laos and the man in Peking, One may well consider wether the '' Inevitability of victory'' in which the communists place such faith is on the side of the guerrilla movement in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It is these continents that have been pronounced by Peking to be the decisive battleground of the future between '' Imperialism and Sociallism......
As far as I know , Royal from Luang Phabang mostly are living in France some live in the Northeast of the United Staes which is I myself knew them in personally. As for Southern Royal families '' TaKoon'' Nachampasak, they're also living in France and scatering around in the United States especially in the West Coast, and there's also many ''fake'' Nachampasak last name too just to get out of the'' Hell Refugee Camp'' and who can blame them for that ...-
The conflict in our belove country''LAOS'', is in one sence the prolongationof a centuries old process whereby the feudal principalities of the left bank of the Mekong were bound by ties of vassalage and forced alliances to our more powerful neighbors to the Southwest. In another very real sense, however,this conflict is marked by entirely new forces to attraction and subjugation, with far reaching implications for a world in which the confrontation between the newclear powers has reach stalmate and the gap between the '' Have peoples and the have not peoples is wider than it has ever been. Even then, the United States coveted no material possessions in Laos and other countries of Indochina. It was conceivable that it might assume a new role once the colonial war ended. American went to LAOS to establish technical assistance missions. but the fighting did not stop. Cynically encuraged by the Vietnamese Communists across an ill defined border, a minority faction of the nationalist movement that had been alienated by the west sought to widen its influence in Laos, using guerrilla warfare to achieve this goal. the implications of the Laos conflict are clear. Given the close identity of views between the man responsible for North Vietnam's successes in Laos and the man in Peking, One may well consider wether the '' Inevitability of victory'' in which the communists place such faith is on the side of the guerrilla movement in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. It is these continents that have been pronounced by Peking to be the decisive battleground of the future between '' Imperialism and Sociallism......
I truly agreed with you all your comments had said, but that had been done you and I can not bring story back to resolve it what happen in past, it always be in the historybook. Just say that we can blame these "Imperialism and Communism" as you can see our belove call "LAOS" it is in middle of something, these two neighbors Vietname and Siam are very aggressive people, as I know my father used to tell me when he was royal army. so we blame them Vietname and Siam, but it is in the past and let move on to the futhure and I had heard that 40 million lao people live in Siam state and they never know themselve as laotiane people because lao people can't understand each other. most of all blame us.
