Pasalao

ຄົນປະເທດສິງກາໂປເຂົາມີຊັບທາງປັນຍາ  ແມ່ນແຕ່ນ້ຳດື່ມກະຍັງນຳເຂົ້າຈາກຕ່າງປະເທດ ເລື້ອງຊັບພະຍາກອນທຳມະຊາດບໍ່ຕ້ອງໄປເວົ້າເຖີງ ບໍ່ມີ ຫລືມີນ້ອຍທີ່ສຸດ  ແຕ່ສິງກາໂປ ຄົນເຂົາມີຄຸນນະພາບທາງດ້ານການສືກສາ ໃນປະເທດໃຊ້ພາສາອັງກິດເປັນພາສາລາດສະການ ນີ້ກະເປັນການສະຫລວກໃນການຄ້າຂາຍຕິດກັບປະເທດທີ່ຈະເລີນແລ້ວ  ແລະຄວາມຮັບຜິດຊອບຂອງຄົນສິ່ງກາໂປສູງ ໂດຍສະເພາະແມ່ນເຈົ້າຫນ້າທີ່ລະດັບສູງ  ແລະກົດຫມາຍຂອງເຂົາເຂັມງວດ  ບໍ່ໃຊ້ເສັ້ນໃຊ້ສາຍ 

ໃນປະເທດກຸ່ມອາຊຽນນີ້ ເຫັນແຕ່ປະເທດສິງກາໂປນີ້ເປັນອັນດັບຫນື່ງ ໃນການການພັດທະນາ ເສດຖະກິດ ແລະ ອື່ນ ໆ  ຄວາມເຫັນສ່ວນຕົວ

                                                          ຂໍຂອບໃຈ

ສິງກາໂປທີມີພັກການເມື້ອງແຕ່ພຽງພັກດຽວກໍ່ຈີງ ແຕ່ສິງກາໂປເປັນປະເທດ ປະຊາຊົນທິປະໃຕ,ປະຊາຊົນມີສິດເສຣີພາບ ແລະ ສະເມີພາບທຸກໆຄົນ ບໍ່ມີຜູ້ໃດຢູ້ເໜືອກົດໜາຍ ແຕ່ລາວແມ່ນປະເທດເສັ້ນສາຍແລະໃຊ້ອິດຕິພົນແລະ ສໍ້ຣາດບັງຫຼວງຊື່ງຖືເປັນເຣື້ອງທັມະດາ.

ລາວແມ່ນປະເທດເສັ້ນສາຍແລະໃຊ້ອິດຕິພົນແລະສໍ້ຣາດບັງຫຼວງຊື່ງຖືເປັນເຣື້ອງທັມະດາ.

Singapore is democracy country and have a single political party.

Singapore govertment from top to buttom line had been voted

by its populations. Especially everyone has freedom to vote,

freedom to protest and its populations are educated. No corruption

in this country, if someone does they will send him/her to death.

 

Laos is communist country and has a single political party same

Singapore as well but Laos is communist country. Laos goverments

from top to buttom line hadn't been voted by Lao people. Lao people

have no freedom to speak, no freedom portest the governments.

Lao people have no right to vote for their governments. Especially

Lao people and the government are lack of educated.

Anonymous wrote:

---

ຄົນປະເທດສິງກາໂປເຂົາມີຊັບທາງປັນຍາ  ແມ່ນແຕ່ນ້ຳດື່ມກະຍັງນຳເຂົ້າຈາກຕ່າງປະເທດ ເລື້ອງຊັບພະຍາກອນທຳມະຊາດບໍ່ຕ້ອງໄປເວົ້າເຖີງ ບໍ່ມີ ຫລືມີນ້ອຍທີ່ສຸດ  ແຕ່ສິງກາໂປ ຄົນເຂົາມີຄຸນນະພາບທາງດ້ານການສືກສາ ໃນປະເທດໃຊ້ພາສາອັງກິດເປັນພາສາລາດສະການ ນີ້ກະເປັນການສະຫລວກໃນການຄ້າຂາຍຕິດກັບປະເທດທີ່ຈະເລີນແລ້ວ  ແລະຄວາມຮັບຜິດຊອບຂອງຄົນສິ່ງກາໂປສູງ ໂດຍສະເພາະແມ່ນເຈົ້າຫນ້າທີ່ລະດັບສູງ  ແລະກົດຫມາຍຂອງເຂົາເຂັມງວດ  ບໍ່ໃຊ້ເສັ້ນໃຊ້ສາຍ 

ໃນປະເທດກຸ່ມອາຊຽນນີ້ ເຫັນແຕ່ປະເທດສິງກາໂປນີ້ເປັນອັນດັບຫນື່ງ ໃນການການພັດທະນາ ເສດຖະກິດ ແລະ ອື່ນ ໆ  ຄວາມເຫັນສ່ວນຕົວ

                                                          ຂໍຂອບໃຈ

---

Sorry to write in English.

I agree with you 100%. Singapore law is extremely strict, unlike other countries in ASEAN especially Laos. You will be fined or jailed no matter who you are, how much money you have, or who your parents are. If you violate the law, you can't escape. Singapore is one of the lowest crime rate and safest countries in the world.

Singapore government pays highest salary to high level officials because they want to keep the brightest, best people to work for government and therefore no corruption. Everything the government plans and do is very transparent to the public. Every decision of their minister or prime minister, makes a big difference to their country.

Have we ever seen any good decision made by Laos government? I have seen none.

If our country could follow what Singapore has done in the past, I believe our country could develop faster, even not as much as what Singapore is at today.

The major problem for Laos is corruption among high government officials.

ຂ້ານ້ອຍເບິ່ງຢູ່ເວັບນີ້ http://www.singapore-elections.com/political-parties.html ຄືວ່າສິງຄະໂປມີພັກການເມືອງຫລາຍ ແຕ່ພັກ PAP, WP ແລະ SPP ເທົ່ານັ້ນທີ່ໄດ້ເຂົ້າໄປນັ່ງໃນສະພາ. ຊ່ອຍອະທິບາຍໃຫ້ຮູ້ນໍາແດ່ວ່າ Dominant Party Sysytem ແມ່ນຄືແນວໃດ? ຂອບໃຈ

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

ຂ້ານ້ອຍເບິ່ງຢູ່ເວັບນີ້ http://www.singapore-elections.com/political-parties.html ຄືວ່າສິງຄະໂປມີພັກການເມືອງຫລາຍ ແຕ່ພັກ PAP, WP ແລະ SPP ເທົ່ານັ້ນທີ່ໄດ້ເຂົ້າໄປນັ່ງໃນສະພາ. ຊ່ອຍອະທິບາຍໃຫ້ຮູ້ນໍາແດ່ວ່າ Dominant Party Sysytem ແມ່ນຄືແນວໃດ? ຂອບໃຈ

---

 Please , make the research

http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2754128?uid=3739560&uid=2129&uid=2&uid=70&uid=4&uid=3739256&sid=56165767233

---

 Singapore is one party state after gianed independent from Malaysia in the 1965.

ຕາບໃດທີ່ຜູ່ນໍາຜະເດັດການຄັອມມຸຍນິດລາວຍັງກໍາອໍານາດຢູ່ ປະເທດລາວຄົງຈະບໍ່ເປັນແບບສິງຄະໂປເດັດຂາດ.

ບໍ່ຈໍາເປັນໃຫ້ເຂົາມາປົກຄອງດອກ ພຽງແຕ່ໄປຖອດຖອນບົດຮຽນນໍາເຂົາກໍ່ຄົງຈະດີຂຶ້ນກ່ວານີ້.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

ສົມມຸດ ທົດລອງໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານສິງກາໂປ ມາບໍຣີຫານເມື້ອງລາວຈັກ8ປີ ແລະໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານລາວໄປບໍຣີຫານສິງກາໂປຈັກ8ປີ ຢາກຣູ້ວ່າເມື້ອງລາວຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?ແລະສິງກາໂປຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?

---

 Laos will be out of poverty but Singapore will be broke and bank corrupted because all the money will be disappeared.

---

55555555555555555555555555555555555 ເຈົ້າກະຢ່າເວົ້າໃຫ້ເຂົາຫົວໃສ້ຂົດໃສ້ໂຂເທາະພໍ່ລຸງ, ຣັຖບານລາວກະບໍ່ໂພດປານນັ້ນຕິເບ໊າະ !

Anonymous wrote:

---

ສົມມຸດ ທົດລອງໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານສິງກາໂປ ມາບໍຣີຫານເມື້ອງລາວຈັກ8ປີ ແລະໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານລາວໄປບໍຣີຫານສິງກາໂປຈັກ8ປີ ຢາກຣູ້ວ່າເມື້ອງລາວຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?ແລະສິງກາໂປຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?

---

ລາວອາດຈະເລີນກວ່າເກົ່າ ແຕ່ເສດຖະກິດສິງກະໂປຄຶຊິວອດວາຍບໍ່ເກີນປີດຽວ

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

 

Anonymous wrote:

---

ສົມມຸດ ທົດລອງໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານສິງກາໂປ ມາບໍຣີຫານເມື້ອງລາວຈັກ8ປີ ແລະໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານລາວໄປບໍຣີຫານສິງກາໂປຈັກ8ປີ ຢາກຣູ້ວ່າເມື້ອງລາວຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?ແລະສິງກາໂປຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?

---

 Laos will be out of poverty but Singapore will be broke and bank corrupted because all the money will be disappeared.

---

 

55555555555555555555555555555555555 ເຈົ້າກະຢ່າເວົ້າໃຫ້ເຂົາຫົວໃສ້ຂົດໃສ້ໂຂເທາະພໍ່ລຸງ, ຣັຖບານລາວກະບໍ່ໂພດປານນັ້ນຕິເບ໊າະ !

---

 Not only  the money will all disappear but Singapore will be debt , as well if Lao governement run Singapore only for 8 year but 6 months.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

 

Anonymous wrote:

---

ສົມມຸດ ທົດລອງໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານສິງກາໂປ ມາບໍຣີຫານເມື້ອງລາວຈັກ8ປີ ແລະໄຫ້ຣັຖະບານລາວໄປບໍຣີຫານສິງກາໂປຈັກ8ປີ ຢາກຣູ້ວ່າເມື້ອງລາວຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?ແລະສິງກາໂປຈະເປັນແນວໃດ?

---

 Laos will be out of poverty but Singapore will be broke and bank corrupted because all the money will be disappeared.

---

 

55555555555555555555555555555555555 ເຈົ້າກະຢ່າເວົ້າໃຫ້ເຂົາຫົວໃສ້ຂົດໃສ້ໂຂເທາະພໍ່ລຸງ, ຣັຖບານລາວກະບໍ່ໂພດປານນັ້ນຕິເບ໊າະ !

---

 Not only  the money will all disappear but Singapore will be debt , as well if Lao government run Singapore only for 8 year but 6 months.

---

You spend your time talking nonsenses here! 

---

 None sense but it is the truth. What they really could do but corruption and take the money .

Anonymous wrote:

---

---

 Not only  the money will all disappear but Singapore will be debt , as well if Lao government run Singapore only for 8 year but 6 months.

---

You spend your time talking nonsenses here! 

---

 None sense but it is the truth. What they really could do but corruption and take the money .

---

Singapore is among the least corrupted countries in the world. Laos is among the most corrupted countries. Do you really understand what you wrote?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index  

---

 I meant swap the government . Let the Singapore government to run Laos for 8 years  and let Lao government run Singapore for 8 years .The let wait and see what are going to happen to Laos and  to Singapore.

Most of Singapore presidents and its governments have high education degree plus their population are educated and 65% Singaporeans are skill workers.Singaporeans are hard working people.

Laos and its populations are very low education degree, most of Laos presidents and governments were not even graduated from high school except Prince Souphanouvong and former PM Bouasone.  Especially Laotians are lazy working people ( Khee khanh aew gnow ), eat than sleep that's what they want to do daily.

That's what I saw the difference in between Laos and Singapore.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

 

Most of Singapore presidents and its governments have high education degree plus their population are educated and 65% Singaporeans are skill workers.Singaporeans are hard working people.

Laos and its populations are very low education degree, most of Laos presidents and governments were not even graduated from high school except Prince Souphanouvong and former PM Bouasone.  Especially Laotians are lazy working people ( Khee khanh aew gnow ), eat than sleep that's what they want to do daily.

That's what I saw the difference in between Laos and Singapore.

---

 

ຜູ່ນໍາລາວເປັນຄົນຖະໜອມຖ່ອມຕົວ ເພິ່ນມີຄວາມຮູ້ແຕ່ເພິ່ນບໍ່ໄດ້ອວດອ້າງຄືຜູ່ນໍາປະເທດອື່ນ ແລະດຽວນີ້ຄະນະລັດຖະບານລາວສ່ວນຫຼາຍແມ່ນຈົບປະລິນຍາເອກຂຶ້ນໄປແລ້ວເດີ.(ຂ້ານ້ອຍເວົ້າຕາມບົດສະຫຼຸບຜົນງານແຜນການ 5 ປີ 2006-2010 ເດີ)

---

 People  who wrote in english above; could you please re-read your message and examine yourself if you are lao. Saying that may make you higher interm of dignity. you are living in civilised country but don't forget to make yourself and mind civilised too. And If your education level is lower than bachelor or master degree you should shut your mouth up since you have every good time to educate yourself but only look down laotian.

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

 

Most of Singapore presidents and its governments have high education degree plus their population are educated and 65% Singaporeans are skill workers.Singaporeans are hard working people.

Laos and its populations are very low education degree, most of Laos presidents and governments were not even graduated from high school except Prince Souphanouvong and former PM Bouasone.  Especially Laotians are lazy working people ( Khi khanh news now ), eat than sleep that's what they want to do daily.

That's what I saw the difference in between Laos and Singapore.

---

 

ຜູ່ນໍາລາວເປັນຄົນຖະໜອມຖ່ອມຕົວ ເພິ່ນມີຄວາມຮູ້ແຕ່ເພິ່ນບໍ່ໄດ້ອວດອ້າງຄືຜູ່ນໍາປະເທດອື່ນ ແລະດຽວນີ້ຄະນະລັດຖະບານລາວສ່ວນຫຼາຍແມ່ນຈົບປະລິນຍາເອກຂຶ້ນໄປແລ້ວເດີ.(ຂ້ານ້ອຍເວົ້າຕາມບົດສະຫຼຸບຜົນງານແຜນການ 5 ປີ 2006-2010 ເດີ)

---

 People  who wrote in english above; could you please re-read your message and examine yourself if you are lao. Saying that may make you higher in term of dignity. you are living in civilised country but don't forget to make yourself and mind civilised too. And If your education level is lower than bachelor or master degree you should shut your mouth up since you have every good time to educate yourself but only look down Laotian.

---

 I am neutral I didn't write on any above but I will say the truth . Laotian take it easy and move very slow  and have too many holiday .Singapore workers are working very hard even the Singaporean student  study very hard and very discipline and respect the law and hardly see the simple law be broke  by Singaporean such as littering in the public which Laotian have done right middle of the city and middle of day light. When it come to corruption .Singapore is very little corruption but Lao government corrupted from the top to bottom .Singapore work hard and study hard and little corruption . Laos is lazy , people are not well educated and government are corrupted. Laos was poor yesterday and is poor today and laos will be poor tomorrow.  Government officers who have  degree Phd and doctor  only follow the order from the leader who are not well educated and don't dare to speak out for the Lao people so what good is it .They are afraid and don't dare to stick up for their own people only follow the order from the top.

ຄົນຕ່າງຄົນ ຂົນກົ້ນຕ່າງກັນ ?

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

Anonymous wrote:

---

 

Most of Singapore presidents and its governments have high education degree plus their population are educated and 65% Singaporeans are skill workers.Singaporeans are hard working people.

Laos and its populations are very low education degree, most of Laos presidents and governments were not even graduated from high school except Prince Souphanouvong and former PM Bouasone.  Especially Laotians are lazy working people ( Khee khanh aew gnow ), eat than sleep that's what they want to do daily.

That's what I saw the difference in between Laos and Singapore.

---

 

ຜູ່ນໍາລາວເປັນຄົນຖະໜອມຖ່ອມຕົວ ເພິ່ນມີຄວາມຮູ້ແຕ່ເພິ່ນບໍ່ໄດ້ອວດອ້າງຄືຜູ່ນໍາປະເທດອື່ນ ແລະດຽວນີ້ຄະນະລັດຖະບານລາວສ່ວນຫຼາຍແມ່ນຈົບປະລິນຍາເອກຂຶ້ນໄປແລ້ວເດີ.(ຂ້ານ້ອຍເວົ້າຕາມບົດສະຫຼຸບຜົນງານແຜນການ 5 ປີ 2006-2010 ເດີ)

---

 Master degree from Vietnam you don't have to go school for, just pay them onre thousand us dollar you got it.

( prinya ek jorm porm )

---

 Phd  from China don't have to go to school . The university just give to many leader of the states around the world .

Anonymous wrote:

---

ຢາກຣູ້ວ້າ ພວກທ່ານມີຄວາມຄິດເຫັນ ຢ່າງໃດກຽວກັບປະເທດສິງກາໂປ ( Singapore ) ຊືງເປັນປະເທດທີມີພັກການເມື້ອງແຕ່ພຽງພັກດຽວຄືກັນກັບປະເທດລາວແຕ່ສິງກາໂປ(Singapore)ມີການສໍ້ຣາດບັງຫຼວງໜ້ອຍທີສຸດແລະເປັນປະເທດຈະເຣີນ, ຣັງມີ, ທັນສະໄໝແລະກ້າໜ້າທີສຸດ ແຕ່ສິງກາໂປ (Singapore)ເປັນປະເທດທີບໍ່ມີອຸປະກອນທັມະຊາດ ແມ້ນແຕ່ທີດີນຈະເຫັດໃຣ ,ເຫັດນາແລະລ້ຽງສັດ ຊືງລາວມີຄວາມອຸດົມສົມບຸນໄປດ້ວຍອຸປະກອນທັມະຊາດ ເປັນຫຍັງລາວມີການສໍ້ຣາດບັງຫຼວງຫຼາຍ.

ສິງກາໂປທີມີພັກການເມື້ອງແຕ່ພຽງພັກດຽວແຕ່ປະຊາຊົນ

ເປັນຜູ້ເລືອກຕັ້ງປະທານປະເທດແລະທຸກສະຊິກໃນພັກມີສິດສະມັກເຂົ້າແຂ່ງຂັນໃນການເລືອກຕັ້ງ.ແຕ່ປະຊາຊົນລາວບໍ່ມີສິດເລືອກຕັ້ງປະທານປະເທດ.

---

ການປົກຄອງແບບມີຫລາຍພັກກໍຫາກດີ ມີຜູ່ໂຕ້ແລະທ້ວງຕິງຜົນທີ່ອອກມາມັນກໍມີປະສິດທິພາບ　ແຕ່ປະເທດປົກຄອງແບບພັກດຽວກໍປະສົບຜົນສຳເລັດໃຫ້ເຫັນ
ແລ້ວເຊ່ນ　ສິງຄະໂປ　ຈີນ　ແຕ່ການປົກຄອງແບບພັກດຽວໂດຍປາສຈາກຄໍຣັບຊັ່ນນັ້ນເປັນບັນຫາຫຍຸ້ງຍາກ　ເພາະການສິອອກກົດຫມາຍໂດຍທີ່ທຸກຄົນ(ລວມທັງຜູ່ອອກກົດຫມາຍເອງ)ຕ້ອງນັບຖືແລະຢູ່ໄຕ້ຂໍ້ບັງຄັບຂອງກົດໝາຍຢ່າງເຂັ້ມງວດນັ້ນ　ຕ້ອງອາໃສຄວາມກ້າຫານ　ເສັຍສລະເປັນຢ່າງສູງຈຶ່ງຈະເຮັດໄດ້　ແຕ່ຂ້ານ້ອຍເຊື່ອວ່າໃນອານາຄົດອັນໄກນີ້້　ທາງການນຳຂອງລາວເຮົາຄົງຈະກ້າຫານແລະໃຈກ້ວາງ　ພໍທີ່ຈະແກ້ໄຂບັນຫາຊຳເຮື້ອອັນນີ້ໃຫ້ໄດ້ ເພື່ອໃຫ້ເມືອງລາວເຮົາກັບມາຮຸຸຸຸ່ງເຮືອງເໝືອນດັ່ງອານາຈັກລ້ານຊ້າງໃນອາດີດ.

Anonymous wrote:

---

ການປົກຄອງແບບມີຫລາຍພັກກໍຫາກດີ ມີຜູ່ໂຕ້ແລະທ້ວງຕິງຜົນທີ່ອອກມາມັນກໍມີປະສິດທິພາບ　ແຕ່ປະເທດປົກຄອງແບບພັກດຽວກໍປະສົບຜົນສຳເລັດໃຫ້ເຫັນ
ແລ້ວເຊ່ນ　ສິງຄະໂປ　ຈີນ　ແຕ່ການປົກຄອງແບບພັກດຽວໂດຍປາສຈາກຄໍຣັບຊັ່ນນັ້ນເປັນບັນຫາຫຍຸ້ງຍາກ　ເພາະການສິອອກກົດຫມາຍໂດຍທີ່ທຸກຄົນ(ລວມທັງຜູ່ອອກກົດຫມາຍເອງ)ຕ້ອງນັບຖືແລະຢູ່ໄຕ້ຂໍ້ບັງຄັບຂອງກົດໝາຍຢ່າງເຂັ້ມງວດນັ້ນ　ຕ້ອງອາໃສຄວາມກ້າຫານ　ເສັຍສລະເປັນຢ່າງສູງຈຶ່ງຈະເຮັດໄດ້　ແຕ່ຂ້ານ້ອຍເຊື່ອວ່າໃນອານາຄົດອັນໄກນີ້້　ທາງການນຳຂອງລາວເຮົາຄົງຈະກ້າຫານແລະໃຈກ້ວາງ　ພໍທີ່ຈະແກ້ໄຂບັນຫາຊຳເຮື້ອອັນນີ້ໃຫ້ໄດ້ ເພື່ອໃຫ້ເມືອງລາວເຮົາກັບມາຮຸຸຸຸ່ງເຮືອງເໝືອນດັ່ງອານາຈັກລ້ານຊ້າງໃນອາດີດ.

---

Singapore has more than one political party der... pls do a bit of research ..just Goolgle "Singapore of Political Party"

make use of your Internet and Computer..and be resourceful, don't believe everything people say..

---

( http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A8%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%84%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%9B%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C )

(wikipedia)

การเมือง

ระบอบการปกครองของสิงคโปร์ คือ ระบอบประชาธิปไตย มีประธานาธิบดีเป็นประมุข ประธานาธิบดีคนปัจจุบัน คือ นายเซลลาปัน รามานาทาน เข้ารับตำแหน่งตั้งแต่วันที่ 1 กันยายน พ.ศ. 2542 ส่วนนายกรัฐมนตรีคือ นายลี เซียน ลุง ซึ่งรับตำแหน่งต่อจากนายโก๊ะ จ๊กตง และนายลี กวน ยูซึ่งมีฐานะเป็นบิดาของนาย ลี เซียน ลุง สิงคโปร์แยกตัวออกจากมาเลเซียเมื่อปี พ.ศ. 2508 มีการปกครองในระบอบสาธารณรัฐโดยมีประธานาธิบดีเป็นประมุขทางพิธีการ และมีนายกรัฐมนตรีเป็นประมุขทางด้านบริหาร สิงคโปร์เป็นประเทศที่มีความมั่นคงทางการเมืองมากที่สุดประเทศหนึ่งของโลก เพราะนับแต่ตั้งประเทศเป็นต้นมา มีรัฐบาลที่มาจากพรรคเดียวและเป็นรัฐบาลเสียงข้างมาก และมีการควบคุมสิทธิเสรีภาพของสื่อสารมวลชนและประชาชนในการวิพากษ์วิจารณ์รัฐบาลอย่างค่อนข้างเข้มงวด